Bypass Campaign Contacting Coach Companies

Kathryn Middleton, resident and campaigner for a Flockton Bypass, is continuing to contact companies who flout the vehicle access rules from the Grange Moor end of the village. The latest TRO (Traffic Regulation Order) in the form of the weight restriction sign for HGVs, is now enforcible by Police and only specific HGVs, such as emergency vehicles, service buses, and local farm vehicles, are permitted to enter the village from that direction.

Name: Mrs kathryn middleton

Sent: 15 April 2019 17:16
To: Info National Holidays


Please could you tell your drivers to follow the diversion signs instead of travelling illegally through Flockton village on the A637 from Grange Moor roundabout. A new Transport Regulation Order from Kirklees Council has stopped all coaches over 7.5T from 12/4/19. The road is too narrow and is a serious accident waiting to happen. Thank you.

Subject: National Holidays
Date: 2019-04-15 18:42
From: National Customer Services <>

Good evening Mrs Middleton,

Thank you for your email in regards to our coach fleet.

I have confidentially passed your comments onto the Operational Manager to address with all drivers.

In closing, please be assured of my best intentions.

Kind Regards,

Hazel Hall
Customer Services Supervisor
National Holidays
Tel: 01246 223939

New enforcement order for HGVs through Flockton village

Wednesday 10 April 2019

A couple of articles:


Police have backed calls to restrict trucks, articulated lorries and other HGVs travelling through a traffic-clogged rural village on the outskirts of Huddersfield.

It has prompted Kirklees Council to re-draft a 48-year-old order banning vehicles weighing more than 7.5 tonnes from travelling eastbound on the narrow A637 through Flockton.

Emergency services and local buses, as well as utility, farm and residents’ vehicles, are unaffected.

Road into Flockton -

Police back calls to ban trucks and HGVs from Flockton village

Wakefield Express:

Heavy goods vehicles will soon have to steer clear of roads going through Flockton – or face action.

Weight restrictions have been in place on various roads through Flockton, Emley and Middlestown for almost 50 years in a bid to reduce the amount of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs).

Weight restrictions in Flockton -

Here’s why heavy good vehicles are banned for this Yorkshire village


Paula Sherriff Asks Minister in House of Commons to Discuss Flockton Road

14 February 2019

Paula Sherriff (Dewsbury) (Lab)
“The A637 runs through the lovely village of Flockton in my constituency. It is a narrow road and is increasingly used by rat runners and HGVs, despite a prohibition order. There have been many instances of reckless driving and some near misses. Will the Minister meet me to discuss how we can make life safer for the people who live in Flockton?”

Jesse Norman
“If it is a purely local road, I am of course happy to look into the matter but it really falls to the local authority. If there is scope for the road to be part of the major roads network, which, as the hon. Lady will know, is precisely designed to relieve some of the pressures on local communities and the strategic road network, we can have that conversation as well.”

See House of Commons Hansard, Rural Roads: HGV Traffic, here.

David Rawlings (Flockton resident and bypass campaigner)
“Doesn’t seem that Jesse Norman even knows that the road through our village IS ON the MRN!”

More Lorries with ‘Tipping’ Plan?

A report by the Examiner Live, 8 February 2019, suggests “new fears for road safety on accident blackspot Bellstring Lane.”

A tipping plan to “restore land for agricultural use” could result in more heavy trucks on the M1-M62 shortcut route, and fresh concerns have been raised about safety on the rural Kirklees road, long considered to be an accident blackspot.

“The B6118 Liley Lane in Grange Moor, could become further congested by large HGVs delivering 90,000 tonnes of top soil and inert sub soil to restore derelict land.” (Read full article)

Proposed Flockton 20 mph Speed Limit – Pre Scheme Survey

Flockton residents have received a letter regarding the proposed 20 mph speed limit, due to come into force in parts of the village, later this year.

All residents are encouraged to respond to the survey and you can complete it by going to this link:

The survey will be live from Monday 21 January till Friday 22 February 2019.

Once the scheme has been on site for 6 months, a further survey will be produced to evaluate post scheme views.

New Traffic Regulation Order for 7.5T Weight Restriction

Posted as requested by Cllr. John Taylor (17 January 2019)



The Council of the Borough of Kirklees (“the Council”) in exercise of their powers under Sections 1, 2, 3(2) and 4 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (“the Act”) and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act hereby make the following Order which relates to roads at Flockton, Flockton Moor and Emley in the Kirklees District, and Middlestown and Overton in the Wakefield District.



1. ​Save where the context otherwise requires, any reference in this Order to a numbered Article is a reference to the Article bearing that number in this Order.

2.​ In this Order the expression “maximum gross weight” has the same meaning as in Regulation 4 in Section 1 of Part 1 of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002.


Weight Restrictions

3.​ Save as provided in Article 4 no person shall, except upon the direction or with the permission of a police constable in uniform, cause or permit any vehicle of over 7.5 tonnes maximum gross weight to proceed in the lengths of road in the directions specified in the Schedule to this Order.

4.​ Nothing in Article 3 shall render it unlawful for a person to cause or permit any vehicle over 7.5 tonnes maximum gross weight to proceed in the lengths of road so specified if the vehicle is being used:-

​(a) ​in connection with the carrying out on that length of road of any of the ​following operations, namely:-

​​(i) ​building, industrial or demolition operations;
​​(ii)​ the removal of any obstruction to traffic;

​​(iii) ​the maintenance, improvement or reconstruction of that length ​​of road;

​​(iv)​ the laying, erection, alteration or repair in or on land adjacent to ​​that length of road of any sewer or any main, pipe or apparatus ​​for the supply of gas, water or electricity or any ​​​​​telecommunications apparatus as defined in Section 4(3) of the ​​Telecommunications Act 1984.

​(b)​for fire and rescue service, police or ambulance purposes;

​(c) ​in the service of a local authority or water authority in pursuance of ​statutory powers or duties;

​(d) ​for the purposes of agriculture on any land adjacent to that length of ​road or for or in connection with the conveyance or haulage of timber ​felled upon such land;

​(e) ​for or in connection with the conveyance of goods to or from any ​premises on or adjacent to that length of road, or any other road ​accessible from and only from that length of road;

​(f) ​to proceed to or from any premises which are situated adjacent to that ​length of road and at which time the vehicle is to be, or has been, ​garaged, serviced or repaired.

(g) ​to access to and egress from any premises which are situated adjacent to that length of road to proceed and to return from the said premises along the same route

(h) ​is a public service vehicle as defined in section (2)(1)(a) of the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 being a stage carriage being used in the operation of a local service

5.​ The Council are satisfied that for preventing damage to the roads or buildings on or near them and for preserving or improving the amenities of the area through which the lengths of road specified in the Schedule to this Order run by restricting the use of the said lengths of road by vehicles over 7.5 tonnes maximum gross weight, it is requisite that Section 3(1) of the Act should not apply in relation to this Order.



6.​ The restrictions imposed by this Order shall be in addition to and not in derogation of any restrictions or requirements imposed by any Regulations made or having effect as if made under the Act or by or under any other enactment.

7.​ For the avoidance of doubt any reference in this Order to a length of road shall be deemed to be a reference to more than one length of road where the context requires it.

8. ​Any reference in this Order to a Statute or Statutory Instrument shall include reference to any re-enactment or replacement thereof.

9.​ This Order shall come into operation on the day of 2019 and may be cited as the “Kirklees Council (Traffic Regulation) (No.4) Order 2018”.

GIVEN under the Corporate Common Seal of the Council of the Borough of Kirklees this day of Two thousand and Nineteen.

THE CORPORATE COMMON SEAL of​​ THE COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF​​ KIRKLEES was here unto affixed in the​​ presence of:

Assistant Director, Legal, Governance and Monitoring /Authorised Signatory


Download the full document and schedule, here. (Word docx)


NOTE: This a re-advertisement due to the addition of the service bus exemption to the order. Previous objections will still be taken in to consideration.

The Council of the Borough of Kirklees propose to make the above Order under their powers in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 the effect of which, as it affects lengths of road in Flockton Moor, Emley, Middlestown and Overton in the Kirklees district, will be to apply a 7.5 tonne weight restriction to the following roads:

1. The route consisting of Paul Lane, Moor Top Lane, Lenacre Lane, Westfield Lane, Jagger Lane, Chapel Lane, Beaumont Street, Upper Lane, Ash Lane and Woodhouse Lane, in a generally south-eastern direction;
• from its junction with the A642 Wakefield Road
• to its junction with the A636 Wakefield Road

2. A637 Barnsley Road in a generally eastern direction;
• from a point 170 metres south east of its junction with A642 Wakefield Road
• to a point 100 metres east of its junction with Hardcastle Lane.

3. The route consisting of Cross Road, Old Road and Hardcastle Lane, in a generally south-western direction;
• from its junction with the A642 Wakefield Road
• to a point on the A637 Barnsley Road 91 metres east of its junction with Hardcastle Lane.

4. The route consisting of Green Lane, Old Road and Hardcastle Lane, in a generally south-western direction;
• from its junction with the A642 Wakefield Road
• to a point on the A637 Barnsley Road 91 metres east of its junction with Hardcastle Lane.

5. The route consisting of the un-named road immediately west of 184 Old Road, Old Road and Hardcastle Lane, in a generally south-western direction;
• from its junction with the A642 Wakefield Road
• to a point on the A637 Barnsley Road 91 metres east of its junction with Hardcastle Lane.

6. The route consisting of Grange Lane, Old Road and Hardcastle Lane, in a generally south-eastern direction;
• from its junction with the A642 Wakefield Road
• to a point on the A637 Barnsley Road 91 metres east of its junction with Hardcastle Lane.

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ONLY. NO ON SITE CHANGES. Reason: to clarify that the restriction allows access to premises within the boundary of the order to enable appropriate enforcement and for service buses.

NOTE: This a re-advertisement due to the addition of the service bus exemption to the order. Previous objections will still be taken in to consideration.

A copy of this draft Order, together with the plans showing the affected lengths of road and a statement of reasons for proposing the Order may be examined during normal office hours at:-

• 1. Customer Service Centre, Civic Centre 3, Huddersfield
• 2. Or web address:

If you wish to object to the proposed Order you may send grounds of your objection in writing to reach the undersigned by not later than 18th February 2019, quoting reference DEV/JE/D116-1804.

Dated this 18th day of January 2019.

Julie Muscroft signature


Julie Muscroft – Assistant Director – Legal, Governance and Monitoring Kirklees Council, 2nd Floor, High Street Buildings, High Street, Huddersfield, HD1 2ND

Download the Notice of Proposal document, here (Word docx)

Other documents

Flockton TRO Plan 1 (pdf)

Flockton TRO Plan 2 (pdf)

14 January 2019 Update

At the bypass steering group meeting, on Monday 14 January 2019, the following key items were mentioned:

It is the intention of the group to submit the bypass petition to Kirklees Council on 13 February 2019.

Later in this week of 14 January, there will be a notification for HGVs over 7.5T that they will not be permitted to travel through Flockton from the Grange Moor end of the village, and local Police patrols will be ready to enforce this. (There will be some specific exceptions, such as service buses).

Sometime soon, there will also be some new road signs for the school, on approach from the west side of the village, travelling east.

20 MPH Still Going Ahead

On 20 December 2018, Cllr. John Taylor informed the Flockton Community, via facebook, that:

“I have just been notified by Highways that the proposal for a 20 mph limit through the centre of the Village received no objections during the legal consultation period. ” Full response from Highways is shown below:

“The legal advertisement for the speed limit changes in Flockton finished on Friday 14 December and we received no objections to the proposals.

“The next step is for us to contact the school in the New Year to run the competition for the artwork at the bottom of the 20 mph signs, with judging taking place at the end of January. Whilst the school are designing the signs we will look to install all the poles and kit, ready for making the 20 mph live in February.”

If anyone has any questions I can be contacted at or 07831 810096


Flockton Pavement Parking

Some comments from our facebook group (3 December 2018, onwards)

Parking issues have been discussed on the Flockton Community facebook group, over the past few days, following a police presence. David Rawling explains:

“As stated on there, this matter has now been brought to the attention of this group, with some background information, mainly for non-residents unaware of the “history”.

“Firstly though, road users need to be aware that several cars may now have had to resort to parking in the road itself, having no alternative parking spaces. The numbers having to do this will probably increase as the village continues to grow. Some subsequent very slight delays may occur at peak times, whilst traffic negotiates any vehicles parked in these places. Owners obviously would prefer to not have to do this, but feel there is no other option now. Apologies to anyone affected by this.

“Why has this been necessary then? The new central development firstly resulted in the original club car park going (used by several residents I believe), followed by the removal of the “lay-by”, originally intended for customers of the old post office by day, and residents in the evening, generally.  Subsequently, several vehicles parked on the widened pavement, some unfortunately not leaving, or not being able to leave, due to ongoing building work, the regulation space of 1.2 metres for pedestrians to get through, especially those with children and pushchairs. This actually caused a little friction previously within the groups, not to be repeated hopefully, as we all have one common aim.

“Both Kirklees Highways and the police have been aware of this particular problem for some time now. Some started parking on the new development but were requested to move their vehicles by the building company, due to ongoing work, and also with people moving into their new properties. Those who had continued to park on the pavement, close to the access road, obstructed the view of anyone pulling out from there. As had been discussed with the authorities and mentioned [on the facebook group] recently, the police duly appeared as noted above.

“Similar problems exist at other points within the village too. Section 106 monies could, and should, have been used to resolve these foreseeable problems. Another matter though for now.

“We all know the easiest solution to this problem. Some short term pain could potentially result in a long term gain. “

Some extracts from the replies to the above posting (names removed for privacy)

“They [builders and Kirklees] cannot expect to remove the parking availability and Not have people having to find alternatives. The trends are towards multi car households so the problem will only increase. The builders should have been required to provide a replacement for the lay-by parking at the very least.”

“I don’t think Kirklees will give a hoot about the roadside parking as it’s not affecting them at all. Knowing them, they will double yellow both sides of the road as that’s a cheaper option and again penalise the residents of Flockton, rather than deal with the actual issues that you originally started the campaign for.”

Reply from David Rawling:
“That wouldn’t surprise me either. But how would people be able to even drop off or have deliveries made etc? Their representative basically said they’d rather have the “illegal”pavement parking than the legal roadside parking!
The plain truth is they don’t know what to do with the “problem that is Flockton”. Their own words.”

“There’s a lot of mixed reactions to parking outside houses on Barnsley road, unfortunately a lot of complaints where made about pavement parking, after the lay-by was removed by the building firm. I have seen a lot of photos on these Flockton pages complaining about pavement parking; now everyone is parking legally it’s still an issue! The police officer, who came out the other day, informed one of the neighbours there was no law against parking outside our houses… regardless of “designated parking spaces” beside, behind or anywhere to our properties.”